FCC tightens rules on hearing-aid compatibility, addresses microwave backhaul

The Federal Communications Commission tightened rules for handset makers so that more manufacturers will have to offer at least one device that works for people who use hearing aids or cochlear implants. The agency also expanded rules so to include phones sold in all retail channels, not just through service providers.
The FCC adopted a policy statement on hearing-aid compatibility with wireless devices, adopted a second report and order and issued a further notice of proposed rulemaking on the issue. About 8 million people use hearing aids in the United States today, said FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. The FCC is encouraging developers of new technologies to consider hearing-aid compatibility at early stages of the design process, rather than later. The agency also adopted rules that force large manufacturers to make at least one phone that can be used by people who have hearing loss, after a two-year exemption. The time frame for the exemption varies on a number of factors, including when the manufacturer enters the market.
The further NPRM extends the rules to any network that offers wireless voice services, such as a VoIP network, accessed through handsets designed to make voice calls. Genachowsi said the FCC effort “ensures that a wider range of smart phones will be able to be used by people with hearing aids.”
The commission also issued an NPRM and notice of inquiry regarding mobile backhaul. The NPRM seeks to change some outdated regulatory policies to help spur microwave-based mobile backhaul, which is often seen as a good choice for backhaul in rural areas. Among the ideas the commission is considering are ways to increase spectrum use below 13 GHz while protecting incumbent licensees in those bands; and ways to give more flexibility to Broadcast Auxiliary Service licensees and Operational Fixed Microwave licensees, including spectrum sharing.
The FCC also said it has directed staff to coordinate better with the Department of Justice when the two agencies are separately reviewing divestiture requirements as par t of mergers between wireless carriers.