Categories: Capital Markets, Opinion

Venture Capital: A week ranging from the bizarre to the sublime

Venture Capital: A week ranging from the bizarre to the sublime

The VC business can be a strange game sometimes. That was typified for me this week courtesy of two lines in my WSJ reader (see below). While the “Larry the Bird” makeover took top billing on my screen, the two entries surrounded in red got me thinking about more than what the Twitter logo would look like in a green “33″ jersey.

As the so-called “fall-out” from the Facebook IPO continues to annoy many of us, the inevitable cautionary tales have begun to emerge on how some bit of botched due diligence on Facebook’s part will now devalue the ideas of aspiring entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley and beyond. Immediately above this entry, however, was a story about how Donuts, Inc. closed on “$100 million in a mammoth series A funding round” to provide unique domain name extensions beyond the typical .com, .net., .edu ditties that we’re used to.

'mammoth' funding rounds juxtaposed against a cautionary tale

While there is certainly room to debate the correlation of the two articles – and please, feel free to do so in the comments section below – the key takeaway for me is that no one … repeat, no one … truly knows what drives start-up valuations on a case-by-case basis. So, while the Facebook fall-out may well suppress start-up valuations in general for some period of time, the Donuts funding round, combined with other events like announcement of the Dell Innovators Credit Fund prove that venture capital money is flowing. Furthermore, it proves that money will flow in big numbers to companies deemed to have great ideas.

Have a comment? I’d love to see it. Also, you can follow me @steelcityj

2 Responses to “Venture Capital: A week ranging from the bizarre to the sublime”

  1. The Journal article saying Facebook’s flop could affect startup valuations was based on one conversation with one “prominent investor” who was not named. Two other investors who did share their names were quoted as saying that Facebook had not changed anything for them. Good news.

    • Jason Marcheck says:

      Exactly. I felt that when I read the WSJ article that the “prominent investor” was being opportunistic as much as anything… “sorry, kid, you’re idea just isn’t worth as much now…”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Subscribe to RCR eNewsletters


Industry Partner Events

  • Telecom Analytics at CTIA May 22, 2013; Las Vegas, NV
  • TM Forum Management World May 13-16, 2013, Nice France
  • RCR Webinars

    Categories