Reality Check: Overcoming the challenges of delivering high-speed wireless data services
October 13 2009 - 6:00 am ET | Rob Rovetta, VP of Products, Quantance Inc. | RCR Wireless News
Rob Rovetta, VP of Products, Quantance Inc.
Photo credit:Quantance
Editor's Note: Welcome to our weekly Reality Check column. We've gathered a group of visionaries and veterans in the mobile industry to give their insights into the marketplace.
High-speed wireless data applications are exploding in popularity. The Wireless Federation noted in late 2008 that “mobile network operators in developed regions should prepare for a tenfold increase in wireless network traffic by 2015, as data traffic rapidly overtakes voice.”
With demand for high-speed data increasing, wireless carriers have a great opportunity to grow their revenue and differentiate offerings. To accommodate demand, carriers are enhancing their underlying network technology to handle more data at faster speeds. In recent years, the high speed packet access (HSPA) standard has been introduced as the first step toward higher performance in WCDMA networks.
But with the accelerating growth of data services, networks must deliver capacity and speed beyond what initial HSPA standard can provide. To address these immediate needs without significant infrastructure changes, many wireless carriers are upgrading their networks to evolved HSPA (HSPA+), which currently increases data capacity and doubles uplink speeds compared to HSPA standard.
HSPA+ reaches its limits
HSPA+ enhancements are designed to improve data speed and capacity by using higher order modulation (HOM) to pack more data into the same radio bandwidth used by HSPA. HSPA+ signals are four times more complex than today's HSPA signal and require more signal power to maintain performance. However, even today's HSPA mobile devices are often unable to produce maximum power signals consistently or reliably.
As a result, HSPA performance suffers. And for HSPA+, which requires even more power, the chances of achieving its full promise can be severely limited even under normal conditions. Without enough signal power, either data transmission must be slowed or data coverage significantly reduced, eliminating some or much of the benefit of the HSPA+ enhancements.
This has the impact of literally shrinking effective coverage of a cell site or severely reducing data speed across large parts of the cell. Each day bloggers vent their frustration with 3G data performance, which shows how the average user is negatively impacted by HSPA-enabled data cards and smart phones. Given HSPA+'s basic need for more power, it's easy to conclude that we will see an even bigger impact on users of HSPA+-enabled devices, which are coming later this year.
Getting the most out of HSPA+
Clearly, if the industry is going to deliver the full potential of HSPA+, something must be done to compensate for this signal power problem. Wireless carriers could add more cell towers to provide better coverage. But this would limit improvement only to small geographic areas and is generally unrealistic given the cost of comprehensive network overhauls and political barriers to locating new towers. A more effective alternative with more immediate and widespread impact entails increasing the signal power being transmitted from existing cell towers and mobile devices.
Increasing power is reasonably straightforward at the cell towers, but a bigger challenge for the mobile devices. Mobile device transmission circuits use power amplifiers (PAs) that either cannot produce the maximum signal strength needed or struggle to produce it while overheating, distorting the signal or using battery power unacceptably fast.
For data transmissions, the HSPA+ signals have high peak to average ratios (PAR) that cause large swings in voltage levels at the PA and distort much more easily as they are amplified by the PA, particularly at high PA output power. Unfortunately, to maintain signal quality and appropriately manage the high PAR signals, the PA must actually reduce its maximum transmit power levels.
Ironically, in a case where more power is needed, the mobile device actually produces less power, barely meeting the minimum called for in the 3GPP standard. On average for devices meeting the minimum performance, HSPA uplink power from some common data cards reaches only about 20dBm output levels, which is 4.0 dB below the baseline 3GPP specification and the HSPA+ maximum output power is expected to be even less.
Putting power in the users' hands
An ideal way to attack these power challenges at the source could be making the radiofrequency (RF) front end of mobile devices operate more efficiently and with greater linearity, enabling mobile transmit power that is near the desired 3GPP baseline and well above the minimum. This would eliminate the PA's inability to efficiently amplify high PAR HSPA+ signals at maximum and midrange output powers.
By incorporating this solution into the mobile device, the problems associated with limited PA output power could be eliminated, enabling a device to regain most of the power the PA cannot otherwise produce for high PAR signals and regaining coverage and data speed benefits otherwise lost. This technological advancement also would eliminate the need for forklift upgrades to the networks while delivering performance that end users expect.
The exploding demand for wireless data is driving the deployment of HSPA+ to provide faster, higher capacity data services. However, with that comes the need for more uplink signal power from the mobile device that cannot be easily met by today's PA technology. By addressing the fundamental problem of PA efficiency in the mobile device, wireless carriers could take full advantage of network enhancements using HSPA+ and end users could receive the level of service and performance for wireless data that they expect.
Rob Rovetta is VP of Products for Quantance Inc. Rovetta has over 25 years of experience in wireless communications, GPS and digital processing systems in both business and engineering roles. Prior to Quantance, he was senior director of Product Management at Qualcomm's chip division responsible for defining strategic opportunities, marketing, licensing and launching assisted-GPS (AGPS) and Qualcomm's gpsOne technology in location-based services worldwide. Rob came to Qualcomm from SnapTrack, Inc., the start-up that pioneered AGPS, where he was responsible for licensing AGPS silicon and software to chip manufacturers and handset OEMs. Prior to SnapTrack, Rob held leadership positions for Magellan Corporation and Trimble Navigation, where he led business development and product management for GPS-enabled enterprise and consumer products. Before the GPS and communication industries, Rob worked for ROLM Corporation, where he had product management, program management, and system engineering responsibilities for digital processing systems. Rob started his career as a member of the development engineering staff at ESL/TRW, where he designed and produced VHF, UHF and microwave antenna systems for strategic and tactical reconnaissance. Rob earned a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of California at Davis.









This Reality Check column by Rob Rovetta suggests that all carriers need to do to improve 3G coverage is to pump more power through their existing cell sites. Unfortunately, doing this does nothing to improve the handset power (as the piece points out), and higher power does nothing for network capacity, which as the article begins, the Wireless Federation will have to increase tenfold by 2015. I’m sure carriers would love to imagine that they can keep the same infrastructure and simply boost amplification of their signals to address the coverage and capacity challenges of today’s 3G and tomorrow’s 4G services, but it simply isn’t so. The only way to deliver more capacity is to move toward micro-cellular architecture, which requires a lot more base stations along with distributed antenna systems to propagate the signals.
Class Action Lawsuit for Authorized Dealers Against Sprint/Nextel http://www.hwy120.com http://www.ztwireless.com http://www.ztwirelessview.com I am one of the most well-known wireless leaders in Northern California providing wireless solutions for corporate accounts. The difference between my company and everyone else is my exceptional vision and leadership especially on the B2B side. Without sacrificing quality, integrity, and customer service, my abilities have gained me the knowledge and expertise to win numerous awards including top seller award for Northern California from a variety of wireless carriers. Having said that, I was approached by Nextel in 2002 to become one of their B2B Authorized Representatives as a result of my success from previous years. With my exceeding success through the B2B channel, Nextel approached me to do a joint venture on launching new retail locations in the Northern California market since there was no strong retail presence. With knowledge, experience, and expertise I put together one of the most dynamic teams of highly motivated and well qualified communication consultants. In 2003, my ex-colleague and dear friend was invited to join in this new vision. I launched eight locations in Northern California and I was invited to launch new locations in Arizona, Colorado, and Minnesota. In 2005, when the merger with Sprint occurred, the new management team: Mark Sadighian, Paul Harris, and Dennis McSweeney no longer shared the vision that Nextel had with my company. At the same time I found out that my partner was embezzling money and started a new wireless company with another carrier. When I approached Mark Sadighian with my new found news, the advise that I received was to separate our partnership and for me to start a new company under a new name. I was granted an exclusive dealer contract with Sprint/Nextel and their service center. Two months into my new company, I submitted six new retail locations that were denied to me for expansion, but at the same time were handed to someone else. Sprint/Nextel set me up for failure, after I invested hundred of thousands of dollars into the new company. Sprint/Nextel decided at that point not to support me in my visions, ideas, and ventures. As a result, I am seeking other dealers that have had a similar experience as me for a class action lawsuit. Before I posted my story online, I requested the immediate assistance from the CEO of Sprint, Daniel Hesse. He never responded to any of my emails, and at this point left me with no choice, but to put together a class action lawsuit for Authorized Dealers. I will not stop until my losses are compensated. If you are interested in contacting me with any questions, concerns, or to assist me in participating in this class action lawsuit please email me at: sprintactionlawsuit@gmail.com or visit www.nextel.bz